I had the privilege last quarter of teaching a class on first & second Samuel. Studying those books in depth was very beneficial for me and I hope for those in my class. I sometimes feel that I am woefully ignorant of Old Testament history and I am resolved to correct that.
During one class my father-in-law made an observation that I was struck by – he said he saw a television program where one of the speakers noted that King David ran his kingdom much like a mafia don. The more I’ve thought about it, the truer that statement seems.
Some of King David’s actions seem to be much like the mafia kingpins of the movies:
He was at times strangely merciful, while at other times displaying what appears to be arbitrary cruelness (like when he made the men lie down, drew lines around them, and killed some at random in 2 Samuel 8).
Like the mafia code of not killing a “made man”, he deferred to the relentless Saul and spared him when he could have killed him (although, of course, David refused to kill Saul because he always viewed him as the Lord’s anointed). David’s guilt after cutting off part of Saul’s robe (1 Samuel 24) is a strange incident. While few of us could blame David for taking Saul out, David deferred to a higher “code”.
King David kept his army and his bodyguards separate. That is the kind of move that a Mafioso could appreciate. When you see how little it took for Abner and Ishbosheth to fall out (2 Samuel 3), you can appreciate David’s decision to keep these groups separate.
Like any smart “godfather” would tell you, you can’t succeed in times of war without some dangerous and loyal men serving under you. For David, Joab was like a merciless “capo”. Joab was determined that David, not himself, would get the glory for the taking of Rabbah (2 Samuel 12). Joab was willing to say what needed to be said, even if it put him in danger, to ensure that David retained his power (2 Samuel 19). At the same time, Joab was a ruthless and vengeful man, which is seen in the vendetta that ended in Abner’s murder (2 Samuel 3). He also (against David’s wishes) killed the defenseless Absalom, which while defiant, was probably in David’s best interests. Could David have been the successful warrior that he was without Joab at his side? I doubt it.
The end of King David’s days as recorded in 1 Kings brings to mind the day of reckoning where all of the old scores are settled in the Godfather movies. Basically on his deathbed, David has Solomon take care of some unfinished business – namely the executions of Joab and Shimei. Joab is supposedly to be killed for the murders of Abner and Amasa (although I’d venture a guess that the real motivation was the murder of Absalom). Shimei had probably gotten comfortable considering that David spared him in 2 Samuel 19 for cursing him as he fled. After violating the conditions that Solomon had laid out, Solomon finally had his excuse to execute Shimei. If David was Vito Corleone, then Solomon was Michael.
It really is a fascinating comparison – King David and the modern mafia (at least as we see them in movies and television). Perhaps Mario Puzo got some inspiration from Israel’s greatest king. The era of the kings of Israel is a rewarding, and fascinating, study.

7 comments
Comments feed for this article
May 15, 2009 at 5:44 am
ProdigalKnot
Corey,
While I agree that many of us do not give the Old Testament the study it deserves (since Christ tells us it points to Hiim), I honestly think you do David a great injustice to compare him to a ruthless, immoral, and criminal mobster. The loyalty of capos and soldiers in the mob is based on self-preservation and personal advantage for very selfish and greedy reasons. True, there is some comraderie, but those guys don’t enjoy the peace, trust, and assurance David did in his relationship with God.
David had moral and ethical reasons for subduing the Moabites, as prophesied in Numbers 24:17. The fact that they rebelled during Ahab’s reign proves they were a people who would turn on David if he did not use a very firm hand. He humbled them because, according to Jewish legend, “because they had slain his parents and brethren, whom he put under the protection of the king of Moab during his exile.” ref. Matt. Henry
May 15, 2009 at 1:01 pm
coreydavis
Stephen – you totally misunderstood me. King David was a man after God’s own heart. My point is that some of his tactics appear to have been borrowed by the mafia long after he lived.
We must also recognize the weaknesses that some of the Bible’s greatest heroes showed. We generally only point out David’s two transgressions that angered the Lord to the point of action (the Bathsheba/Uriah debacle and the unauthorized census), but there are other actions that weren’t very godly either.
You said:
The loyalty of capos and soldiers in the mob is based on self-preservation and personal advantage for very selfish and greedy reasons. True, there is some comraderie, but those guys don’t enjoy the peace, trust, and assurance David did in his relationship with God.
The “capo” comparison wasn’t directed at David, but at Joab. You would have a hard time proving Joab to be a very godly man.
As to the Moabites, I believe that the drawing of lines and killing some at random was meant to send a message – the Israelites were not to be taken lightly. I’m sure the word of that incident spread widely. I was simply pointing out that the manner in which David went about it would seem, to many, as arbitrary and cruel.
I think you have missed my point – it is not that David was like a ungodly mobster, but that the mob seems to have borrowed some strategies from the godly king.
May 15, 2009 at 4:29 pm
ProdigalKnot
Corey,
I may have over-reacted. Thank you for your quick and thoughtful reply. I still don’t feel comfortable with the comparison, but it does have some legitimacy.
Still, I disagree that David’s handling of the Moabites was at all arbitrary or cruel. David was doing what was necessary to secure his kingdom. David was pointedly merciful, but in a calculatedly manner. I don’t get the sense that David drew random lines or circles “around” the Moabites. Some commentators think this refers more to removing their strong cities than actually killing the men. Whatever the case, the lines were used to divide beteen those that would live and those that would die. We are not given the specifics as to what David was actually measuring. The height line at amusement parks is what immediately comes to my mind. But, that could be wrong. We don’t even know for sure why David did this to those who were formally his friends, either.
Thank you for stimulating the desire to study these things in-depth.
May 15, 2009 at 5:17 pm
coreydavis
2 Samuel 8: 2 David also defeated the Moabites. He made them lie down on the ground and measured them off with a length of cord. Every two lengths of them were put to death, and the third length was allowed to live. So the Moabites became subject to David and brought tribute.
Notice the parts in bold. Am I missing something?
May 16, 2009 at 7:21 pm
lee
taking things that dont belong to you.
killing to cover it up…………
tony soprano would be proud.
lee
May 18, 2009 at 1:38 pm
coreydavis
Good call, Lee!
May 21, 2009 at 7:41 pm
lee
fagetabout it.